The U.S. Supreme Court this week, in yet another narrow decision, this one titled, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, has struck down a 2015 California law that would have forced pro-life crisis pregnancy centers to advertise abortions, that is, centers established for the very purpose of not doing abortions and providing an alternative to abortion. This patently unjust law would have compelled the centers—many of them religious, with conscientious objections to abortion—to advertise state-subsidized abortion clinics in their waiting rooms and in their handouts to patients.
Religious Liberty
The Supreme Court Deals a Blow to the Abortion Industry
By Paul Kengor ● Crisis Magazine ● 06/29/2018
Other Articles In This Category:
National Review ● By JONATHAN S. TOBIN
In New York, Protests Must Go On, but Religious Services May Not
Law & Liberty ● By Karen Taliaferro
Overcoming the Dilemma of Religious Liberty
Washington Examiner ● By Nicholas Rowan
Attorney General Barr has Become Trump’s Religious Liberty Enforcer
Law & Liberty ● By Mark David Hall
Religious Liberty in a Hostile Age
Wall Street Journal ● By The Editorial Board