The U.S. Supreme Court this week, in yet another narrow decision, this one titled, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, has struck down a 2015 California law that would have forced pro-life crisis pregnancy centers to advertise abortions, that is, centers established for the very purpose of not doing abortions and providing an alternative to abortion. This patently unjust law would have compelled the centers—many of them religious, with conscientious objections to abortion—to advertise state-subsidized abortion clinics in their waiting rooms and in their handouts to patients.
Other Articles In This Category:
Washington Post ● By Adam Taylor & Rick Noack
Sri Lanka Church Bombings Stoke Far-Right Anger
Religious Freedom Center ● By Asma T. Uddin
DOES THE SUPREME COURT HAVE A RELIGIOUS DOUBLE STANDARD? FACTORS TO CONSIDER.
Deseret News ● By Kelsey Dallas
President Donald Trump Wants to Add A Citizenship Question to the Census. What About A Question On Religion?
The Washington Examiner ● By Mike Berry
The Pentagon Isn’t Doing Enough to Protect the Religious Liberties of Those Who Serve
Real Clear Religion ● By Robin Fretwell Wilson