The rubber for the marriage movement will meet the road on the issue of religious liberty. By conceding to “social harm” and “social meaning” arguments, Anderson and Girgis make it more difficult to defend religious liberty against anti-discrimination laws.
Other Articles In This Category:
POLITICO ● By Lorraine Woellert
Trump’s Religious Freedom Squad Promises to Deliver
The Economist ● By Erasmus
Sam Brownback Makes the Right Noises about Religious Liberty
Real Clear Religion ● By William N. Eskridge, Jr. & Robin Fretwell Wilson
Anthony Kennedy Opens New Chapter in American Pluralism
Crisis Magazine ● By Scott P. Richert
Would a Justice Kavanaugh Defend Religious Liberty?
Commentary Magazine ● By Sohrab Ahmari